Stress reactions and health problems in hospital personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic-A longitudinal, multicenter study

Background: The overarching aim of the study was to (1) investigate how working with COVID-19 patients has impacted work environment, and (2) to identify how factors in the work environment impact adverse health outcomes among hospital personnel (HP), throughout the four waves of the pandemic. Material(s) and Method(s): In a web-based survey altogether 2472 HP participated from four large university hospitals in Norway, whereof N = 680 in April-June 2020 (T1), N = 1073 in December-January 2020/2021 (T2), N = 818 in April-May 2021 (T3), and N = 972 in December 2021-February 2022 (T4). At each time point participants reported on pandemic related work tasks, work environment and adverse health outcomes. Somatic symptoms, psychological distress, posttraumatic stress symptoms and burnout served as outcomes of multivariable linear regression models. The percentage of responders involved in ICU treatment of COVID-19 patients varied between 21% and 40% from T1-T4. Result(s): Reported stressors altered in strength during the 4 waves. Preliminary results indicate that exposure to patients with COVID-19 was associated with more frequent experience of work environmental factors. Compared to colleagues not working with patients with COVID-19 HP reported challenges related to professional competency and training, predictability in teams and work environment, manageable workload, adequate help and support for work stress management, user-friendliness of Personal Protection Equipment and infection protection safety. Furthermore, these environmental factors were associated with symptoms of psychological unhealth on at least one timepoint. Conclusion(s): The results may help guide organizational efforts to maintain professional competency and to reduce stress more efficiently among hospital personnel at different stages in response to long-term crises.

Findings from the ECHO Cohorts Regarding the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Studies suggest perinatal infection with SARSCoV- 2 can induce adverse birth outcomes, but studies published to date have substantial limitations. Most have identified cases based upon their presentation for clinical care, and very few have examined pandemic-related stress which may also impact adverse birth outcomes. Objective(s): To evaluate the relationships between SARSCoV- 2 infection in pregnancy and pandemic-related stress with birth outcomes. Study Design: We conducted an observational study of 211 mother-newborn dyads in three urban cohorts participating in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Serology for SARS-CoV-2 was assessed in a convenience sample of prenatal maternal, cord serum or dried blood spots from births occurring between January 2020-September 2021. Specimens were assessed for IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies to nucleocapsid, S1 spike, S2 spike, and receptor-binding domain. A Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress (PTS) scale was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Acute Stress Disorder criteria. Result(s): 36% were positive for at least one antibody type, chiefly IgG. Self-report of infection was not significantly correlated with combined serology. There were no differences in gestational age (GA), birth weight, preterm birth (PTB), or low birth weight (LBW) among seropositive mothers. However, IgM seropositive mothers had children with lower BW (434g, 95% CI: 116- 752), BW Z score-for-GA (0.73 SD, 95% CI 0.10-1.36) and were more likely to deliver preterm (OR 8.75, 95% CI 1.22-62.4). Associations with LBW sustained in sensitivity analyses limited to pre-vaccine samples, and PTS symptoms were not associated with birth outcomes. The addition of PTS did not substantially change associations with BW, although associations with PTB attenuated to near-significance. Conclusion(s): We identified decreased birth weight and increased prematurity in mothers IgM seropositive to SARS-CoV-2, independent of PTS. Though there are limits to interpretation, the data support efforts to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancy.

Mental Health and Coping Strategies among University Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross–Sectional Analysis from Saudi Arabia

This study examined psychological health and coping strategies among faculty and staff at a Saudi Arabian university. A web-based self-administered survey was used to assess probable anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and coping strategies by using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and Brief-COPE scale, respectively. Of 502 participants (mean age 36.04 ± 10.32 years, male: 66.3%), 24.1% (GAD-7 ≥ 10) had probable anxiety. Anxiety score was significantly higher in females (p < 0.001), those with a history of COVID-19 infection (p = 0.036), and participants with less work experience (p = 0.019). Approximately 40% of participants met the criteria of probable depression, with females (p < 0.001) and participants with less experience having more depressive symptoms. Around one-fourth (27.7%) of study participants indicated probable PTSD (score ≥ 33), with higher symptoms in females (p <0.001), less experienced staff (p < 0.001), and academic staff (p = 0.006). Correlation analysis indicated a significant positive correlation between anxiety and depression (r = 0.844, p < 0.001), anxiety and PTSD (r = 0.650, p < 0.001), and depression and PTSD (r = 0.676, p < 0.001). Active coping, religious/spiritual coping, and acceptance were common coping strategies, while substance use was the least adopted coping method among the study participants. This study indicated a high prevalence of probable psychological ailments among university staff.

Variations in circadian rhythmicity and students' gender-related psychological conditions during the COVID-19 lockdown

In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced around the world, new student lifestyles have had an impact on their daily behavior. The purpose of this study was to examine post-traumatic stress associated with the initial COVID-19 crisis in students (N = 280) with a mean age of 13 +/- 1.70 and to determine the relationship between their reported daily behaviors in terms of their gender. The study was conducted primarily in Casablanca and Marrakech, the two cities most affected by the pandemic at the time of the study in Morocco in May 2020. Our sample consists of 133 high school students and 147 middle school students, 83.6% of whom are females. Students were asked to answer questions based on an Activity Biorhythm Questionnaire, the Post-Traumatic Stress Scale (Weathers et al., 1993), the Hamilton Scale (Hamilton, 1960), the Worry Domains Questionnaire (Tallis, Eyzenck, Mathews, 1992), and the Visual Analog Scale of Moods (VASM) (Stern et al., 1997). The results obtained confirm that there is a significant relationship between the circadian rhythm of some variables and gender in some activities such as academic study (p < 0.05) and TV and Internet use (p < 0.05) and was highly significant for physical activity (p = 0.001), while others are not significant in relation to other schedules of the same variables or in relation to others. Likewise, for the psychological conditions, significant relationships with mood states and depressive tendencies were confirmed. In lockdown, the students' daily lives underwent changes in circadian rhythm and lifestyle. Therefore, it is necessary to treat their current psychological problems and avoid future complications. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Differences in traumatic stress among youth with and without chronic medical conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic is the deadliest pandemic in American history. This study aims to assess the differences in youth reported traumatic stress among those with and without chronic illness, and how those reports are impacted by parental level of concern regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using convenience sampling, parents and their children completed a series of questionnaires focused on demographic information including questions about medical conditions, parental level of concern about COVID-19, and youth-report of posttraumatic stress symptoms. Results: Results of the anonymous survey (n = 164) found that parental reported level of concern of COVID-19 significantly predicted youth report of posttraumatic stress symptoms (F(4, 159) = 2.607, p = .038). There was no significant difference in youth-report of posttraumatic stress symptoms between youth with and without chronic medical conditions (F(1, 162) = .438, p = .509). Conclusions: Children often look to their parents for guidance during stressful life events, as confirmed by our findings. Parental emotional and behavioral responses may influence how youth make sense of highly stressful events and should be considered when determining intervention strategies in the COVID-19 era. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement This study found that youth with and without chronic health conditions did not differ in their report of posttraumatic stress 6 months after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, youth report of traumatic stress symptoms was predicted by their parents' level of concern regarding the impact of COVID-19 on their families, suggesting the need for targeted parent-based intervention. Clinical interventions to prevent chronic posttraumatic stress responses in youth regardless of medical comorbidity are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Mental health outcomes in physiotherapists in COVID-19 and non-cOVID-19 care units: a cross-sectional survey in Belgium

Background: Little is known about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physiotherapists' mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physiotherapists' mental health in Belgium. Method(s): A total of 115 physiotherapists from 12 general hospitals in Brussels, working in COVID-19 care units (CCU) or non-COVID-19 care units (NCCU), participated in an electronic survey including validated measurement tools for PTSD, anxiety, insomnia and burnout. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess differences in mental health outcomes between physiotherapists who worked in a CCU and those who worked in an NCCU. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were also performed to assess risk factors for burnout. Result(s): Results showed significant levels of PTSD (9.6%), anxiety (33.9%), insomnia (40%) and burnout (33.9%) among participants. However, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. It was also found that being isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic was a risk factor for burnout. Conclusion(s): Although no significant differences were found between the two groups, this study highlights a concerning rate of psychopathological symptoms among participants. Hospitals should therefore invest more time and resources into actions aiming at preserving the mental health of physiotherapists.Copyright © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Scientific rationale of Indian AYUSH Ministry advisory for COVID-19 prevention, prophylaxis, and immunomodulation

The current outbreak of COVID-19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that has affected > 210 countries. Various steps are taken by different countries to tackle the current war-like health situation. In India, the Ministry of AYUSH released a self-care advisory for immunomodulation measures during the COVID-19 and this review article discusses the detailed scientific rationale associated with this advisory. Authors have spotted and presented in-depth insight of advisory in terms of immunomodulatory, antiviral, antibacterial, co-morbidity associated actions, and their probable mechanism of action. Immunomodulatory actions of advised herbs with no significant adverse drug reaction/toxicity strongly support the extension of advisory for COVID-19 prevention, prophylaxis, mitigations, and rehabilitation capacities. This advisory also emphasized Dhyana (meditation) and Yogasanas as a holistic approach in enhancing immunity, mental health, and quality of life. The present review may open-up new meadows for research and can provide better conceptual leads for future researches in immunomodulation, antiviral-development, psychoneuroimmunology, especially for COVID-19.Copyright © 2021, Institute of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University.

The Earthquake Disaster in Turkiye: A Review from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Perspective

The earthquake has long-lasting various mental and behavioral effects on children and adolescents. The aim of this review was to discuss the nature and extent of psychiatric problems, management options, and the process of organizing psychological interventions for affected children. Individuals show a range of physically, emotionally, and cognitively healthy responses that can help them cope with the aftermath of a disaster. Psychiatric symptoms such as acute stress reactions, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, increased risk of suicide, sleep disorders, substance use disorders, and psychotic disorders may develop in some children. Comorbidities and sub-clinical syndromes are also common. There are many risk factors and protective factors in the development of mental disorders. Close follow-up of children at high risk and interventions for psychosocial support may prevent the development of mental disorders. It is very important to start the intervention at the earliest period. The psychological impacts of young disaster victims can be addressed by skilled local volunteers, medical professionals, and educators in primary health care programs. With the nation's overall social and economic recovery, children can recover more quickly from traumatic experiences.Copyright © 2023, Duzce University Medical School. All rights reserved.

Online adaptation of a compassion-focused intervention to treat comorbid eating disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aims: To provide psychological support for individuals recovering from comorbid eating disorders (EDs) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during the COVID-19 pandemic, we adapted a 10-session compassion-focused group-based intervention for delivery online using video conferencing technology. This study describes how the group content and resources were adapted and synthesizes qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. Method(s): Content and format were modified and a new website to host supporting material was developed. Clear guidelines regarding recruitment and acceptance into the group, boundaries within the group, and risk management were implemented. Structured qualitative interviews regarding participants' online group experiences were conducted with 17 women following the group completion. Result(s): In-depth communication concerning group expectations and activities was important during assessment to ensure the intervention was well-suited to prospective participants. Consistent implementation of group guidelines by facilitators was critical in maintaining a safe online environment. Participants indicated online delivery increased logistical accessibility, as many reported they would have been unable to attend otherwise (e.g., time, geographical location), and reduced fear of judgement and anxiety about in-person attendance. Favourable online adaptations reported by participants included inclusion of all group members, opportunities to share in smaller groups/pairs and online resources. Conclusion(s): Delivery of group-based compassion-focused interventions for individuals with comorbid EDs and PTSD are appropriate for overcoming barriers that may otherwise prevent participation. Online resources could potentially increase intervention uptake among individuals in the early stages of recovery from these disorders.

Peripartum Covid 19 admissions in an intensive care unit - Case series

Introduction: Peripartum women are at increased risk for severe illness with coronavirus disease (Covid-19) infection. Recent medical literature has drawn attention to the possible influence of COVID-19 on the course of pregnancies and its long-term effects.1-5 Objective: This case series aimed to observe the clinical course of peripartum women with confirmed Covid-19 admitted to a critical care unit in the North-west of England. Method(s): Since the start of the pandemic, all pregnant women with Covid-19 infection admitted to the critical care unit were monitored and followed up. Demographic profile, medical co-morbidities, treatment received, respiratory support and vaccination status were noted. Result(s): From March 2020 until February 2022, 8 women in our practice were shifted to the critical care unit post-partum in view of worsening work of breathing & increasing oxygen requirement after initial management in the delivery suite. All admissions were during the 3rd wave of the pandemic in the UK, between June to October 2021. 5 patients underwent Caesarean section under spinal anesthesia & 3 were shifted post normal vaginal delivery. Mean age in the study population was 33.25 years (SD +/- 3.99) and mean length of stay in the ICU was 6.62 days (SD +/- 3.99). Only one woman required intubation & mechanical ventilation for 10 days and the rest were managed on High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) hood and self-proning manoeuvres. 50% of the patients received Tocilizumab. All women were discharged home and there were no maternal deaths. Pre- admission none of the women were vaccinated, but on follow up 5 out of the 8 had completed their vaccination. All women were emotionally distraught due to being isolated from their family and new born. When reviewed at 12 weeks, one patient experienced post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and one had features of long Covid syndrome. On follow up, all new born babies were doing well. Conclusion(s): From the limited amount of data available, psychological stress was common to all patients. Being isolated from their new-born and family was the most difficult emotional aspect for the mothers in addition to finding it difficult to breathe and uncertainty about the future. Most mothers and new-born babies were discharged from the hospital without any serious complications. However, further observation and long term follow up is imperative. Use of guidelines in peripartum patients will aid in appropriate escalation of care. Key words: COVID-19, Pregnancy, Peri-partum, Long Covid syndrome.

Long-Term Neurologic Sequelae Among Patients with Varying COVID-19 Severity: An Administrative Claims Database Analysis

Objectives: Examine the long-term incident neurologic sequelae post COVID recovery and assess relationship with COVID severity using real-world data. Method(s): This retrospective cohort study was conducted using Optum Research Database between 01July2019 to 30Sep2022. Patients included were >=18 years with COVID diagnosis (index date) between 01Jan2020 and 31Oct2020, with continuous enrollment 6 months before and >=12 months after index date, known demographics, not pregnant, and with no baseline neurologic conditions. Patients were stratified into COVID severity cohorts as mild (index diagnosis), moderate (inpatient visit within 15 days of index), or severe (evidence of acute respiratory distress) and followed for a minimum of 12-months post-index. Neurologic sequelae examined were persistent headache, migraine, anosmia, sleep disturbance, cognitive dysfunction, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidality, anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cerebrovascular disease (CVD), fatigue/myalgia and tremors. Descriptive statistics and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated to assess outcomes. Result(s): Of 534,843 patients, 107,656 (Mild 96,637;Moderate 3,371;Severe 7,648) met the study inclusion criteria. Median follow up time was 750, 774 and 768 days in the mild, moderate and severe cohorts, respectively. About 20% of patients in the mild, 32% in moderate and 35% in the severe cohort experienced >=3 neurologic sequelae during the follow-up period. A significantly higher incidence of any neurologic sequelae was observed in moderate and severe cohorts compared with the mild cohort (IRR 3.1 and 3.0, respectively;p<0.001). Cognitive dysfunction (moderate IRR 5.4, severe IRR 5.7;p<0.001), and CVD (moderate IRR 4.8, severe IRR 4.0;p<0.001) were the most commonly occurring manifestations in moderate and severe cohorts compared with the mild cohort. Conclusion(s): These results highlight the need for long-term monitoring and preventative strategies for neurologic conditions post COVID recovery that might impair quality of life and increase overall healthcare burden in the U.S.Copyright © 2023

Similar symptoms at 3 months post discharge in ICU, COVID-19 ICU, and COVID-19 patients that received non-invasive ventilation in high dependency areas

Introduction: It is well documented that survivors of ICU admissions struggle to return to pre-admission level of function because of both physical and psychological burden. Current guidance therefore recommends a follow-up service to review patients 2-3 months post discharge from ICU [NICE 2009]. Prior to 2020 University Hospitals Bristol and Weston (UHBW) had no such service. With the increase in patient numbers seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was received to provide a follow-up clinic to COVID-19 survivors. Spare clinic spaces were used for non COVID ICU patients. Objective(s): To review symptoms reported by patients in the following 3 groups, COVID-19 patients treated in ICU (COVID ICU), COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in high dependency areas (COVID CPAP) and non COVID-19 ICU patients (ICU), at 2-3 months post discharge from UHBW. Method(s): Referred patients had an initial phone call at 8 weeks post discharge. The call identified both physical and psychological symptoms. Advice regarding recovery, signposting to resources and onwards referrals to appropriate specialities were provided. If symptoms indicated, patients would then be referred into the multidisciplinary team follow up clinic. Here they met with an intensivist, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist, speech and language therapist and dietitian. Result(s): As Graph 1 shows all 3 patient groups had a wide variety of ongoing symptoms at 2-3 months post discharge. Fatigue was the most common symptom reported in all 3 groups. Breathlessness was the second most common symptom reported by COVID patients but was less frequently reported in the ICU population who had a variety of non-respiratory related reasons for admission. COVID ICU patients more commonly reported ongoing problems with their swallowing, voice and communication compared to the COVID CPAP group, most probably due to invasive ventilation. Psychological burden post critical illness was high in all 3 groups. More than 20% of all patients scored =10 on a PHQ-9 depression scale showing moderate to severe depression. More than 15% of all patients scored =10 on a GAD-7 showing moderately severe to severe anxiety. COVID ICU group had the highest incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This may be linked to the higher level of delirium we saw in this group, as a result of change in practice, such as full PPE and absence of visiting during the pandemic. ICU patients presented with a significantly higher percentage of physiotherapy needs. This is likely because patients with the longest and most complex ICU admissions were selected for the clinic. Sleep likely goes under reported in these results as we only began questioning specifically about this later on in the clinic. Conclusion(s): This data goes some way in supporting current literature that the rehabilitation needs of COVID ICU patients equal that of ICU patients (Puthucheary et al 2021). It also shows the need to follow up patients who receive advanced respiratory support outside of the ICU environment, as their symptoms, and therefore rehabilitation needs are very similar to ICU patients at 2-3 months post discharge.

Adaptation and Validation of the Questionnaire on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Peruvian Population

Introduction: The high prevalence of mental disorders such as stress, in prolonged stressful situations induced by a pandemic, demands their timely identification and assessment;in order to do this, contextualized instruments with adequate metric properties are required. Objective: To validate the Questionnaire on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Symptomatology in a Peruvian population. Methods: An instrumental study was conducted in the region of Ica, in Peru, from June to November 2021, with 412 adult participants. The process included translation into Spanish, content assessment by judges, and pilot testing. Construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis;and fit, with confirmatory factor analysis, which included the robust unweighted least squares estimation method. Reliability was evaluated with McDonald's Omega, while the posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology was compared with general variables. Results: The obtained version included 18 items, grouped into four factors that explained 70.78% of the total variance. Also, an acceptable fit was obtained [x2/gl=1.54;NFI and CFI=0.99;SRMR=0.052;RMSEA=0.036 (90% CI: 0.26-0.46)]. The items discriminate satisfactorily, as does the scale according to sex, marital status and those with a family member who died from COVID-19. Internal consistency was adequate for the global scale (ω=0.924) and its dimensions (EDA=0.740;IEAN = 0.882;A=0.786 and CE=0.811). Conclusion: The new Peruvian version of the instrument has acceptable metric properties;therefore, its use is recommended for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder and validation studies. © 2023, Editorial Ciencias Medicas. All rights reserved.

Can eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing improve psychological recovery following COVID-19 related critical illness? the CovEMERALD feasibility trial

Introduction: Over 200,000 patients survive an intensive care admission each year in the United Kingdom (UK). For patients, survival is frequently beset by a range of chronic disabilities. Approximately 50% must navigate an often complex convalescence, while suffering serious and persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and/or depression.1 Eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) is a trauma-focussed psychological therapy, recommended for treating PTSD by the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies2 and NICE.3 However, EMDR has never been systematically investigated for patient benefit following intensive care admission. Objective(s): CovEMERALD4 evaluated the feasibility of delivering a randomised controlled trial (RCT), testing the effect of EMDR on the psychological health of intensive care survivors, following COVID-19 related critical illness. We also provide preliminary evidence of the effect on clinically relevant outcomes. Findings will inform the design of a subsequent fully-powered RCT. Method(s): This feasibility RCT was conducted at a single-centre, teaching hospital in the UK (University Hospital Southampton). Patients were eligible if they were admitted to intensive care for over 24-hours with confirmed COVID-19, were above 18 years of age, were recruited within 3-months of hospital discharge, and had no cognitive impairment or pre-existing psychotic diagnosis. Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either up to 8 sessions of remotely-delivered EMDR (Recent traumatic events protocol) or standard care alone as the control group (CG). Psychometric evaluation was undertaken at Baseline and 6-months after hospital discharge. Result(s): Seventy-five consecutive patients were screened at hospital discharge, from October 2020 to April 2021. 51 eligible patients approached. 26 (51%) provided consent. Reasons for declining participation were;no psychological distress (n=16), no internet access (n=7) and being physically unready (n=2). Demographic variables were balanced between groups. Of the 13 patients randomised to EMDR, one withdrew prior to intervention: the remaining attended all sessions recommended by the psychological therapists (mean of 3-4 sessions per patient), giving an overall adherence of 93%. One patient from each group declined the 6-month follow-up evaluation, so trial completion was possible in 23 of 26 (88%) participants. No reasons for trial withdrawal were given. There were no attributable adverse events. Mean change in PTSD score (PTSD Checklist-Civilian) from Baseline to 6-months, was -8 (SD=10.49) in the EMDR group vs. +0.75 (SD=15.17) in CG (p=0.126). Mean change in anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety) was -0.45 (SD=2.3) following EMDR vs. -0.83 (SD=4.0) in the CG (p=0.787), and median change in depression (HADS-D) was -2(IQR:-3.0,1.0) following EMDR vs. +1(IQR-1.5,2.0) in the CG (p=0.263). Figure 1. Box-plot of change in PTSD symptoms (PCL-C) from baseline to 6-months post-hospital discharge for control group and EMDR intervention group. Conclusion(s): EMDR can improve psychological recovery following an intensive care admission for COVID-19, and appeared feasible and safe. Although not powered to determine clinical effectiveness, this single-centre feasibility study returned a positive signal, in reducing PTSD and depressive symptoms. A full results manuscript will be submitted prior to congress. CovEMERALD has supported a successful NIHR doctoral fellowship application, during which protocol refinements will be tested, within existing, and recommended rehabilitation pathways. Trial activity and progression will be consistent with the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex healthcare interventions.5.

Anticipated Long-Term Neurobehavioral Outcomes Following COVID-19

First identified in December 2021, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-the virus causing COVID-19, is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality rates. Given the worldwide impact of COVID-19, there is much interest in the anticipated long-term effects for those with history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. While initially presumed as a respiratory infection, there is now evidence of a broader array of pathophysiological mechanisms which result in a wide spectrum of reported acute and chronic symptoms in patients with confirmed COVID-19. These include including memory and other neurocognitive changes as well as psychiatric and behavioral symptoms. These nonspecific, but often debilitating, sequalaeare complex and difficult to disentangle from more common causes of neurobehavioral change. The goal of this chapter is to discuss anticipated chronic neurocognitive and psychiatric outcomes of COVID-19 survivors based on emerging peer-reviewed literature, data from prior pandemics, and outcome studies from well-characterized, clinically similar syndromes. This unpacking of long-term complications from COVID-19 will seek to set expectations and provide guidance for clinicians who will undoubtably encounter increased volumes of patients with residual post-COVID-19 neurobehavioral changes. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.

Zero Suicide Quality Improvement: Developmental and Pandemic-Related Patterns in Youth at Risk for Suicide Attempts

The Zero Suicide (ZS) approach to health system quality improvement (QI) aspires to reduce/eliminate suicides through enhancing risk detection and suicide prevention services. This first report from our randomized trial evaluating a stepped care for suicide prevention intervention within a health system conducting ZS-QI describes (1) our screening and case identification process, (2) variation among adolescents versus young adults, and (3) pandemic-related patterns during the first COVID-19 pandemic year. Between April 2017 and January 2021, youths aged 12-24 years with elevated suicide risk were identified through an electronic health record (EHR) case-finding algorithm followed by direct assessment screening to confirm risk. Eligible/enrolled youth were evaluated for suicidality, self-harm, and risk/protective factors. Case finding, screening, and enrollment yielded 301 participants showing suicide risk indicators: 97% past-year suicidal ideation, 83% past suicidal behavior;and 90% past non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Compared to young adults, adolescents reported more past-year suicide attempts (47% vs. 21%, p <.001) and NSSI (past 6 months, 64% vs. 39%, p <.001);less depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and substance use;and greater social connectedness. Pandemic onset was associated with lower participation of racial-ethnic minority youths (18% vs. 33%, p <.015) and lower past-month suicidal ideation and behavior. Results support the value of EHR case-finding algorithms for identifying youths with potentially elevated risk who could benefit from suicide prevention services, which merit adaptation for adolescents versus young adults. Lower racial-ethnic minority participation after the COVID-19 pandemic onset underscores challenges for services to enhance health equity during a period with restricted in-person health care, social distancing, school closures, and diverse stresses.Copyright © 2023 Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.

Psychological trauma and depression in recovered COVID-19 patients: A telecommunication based observational study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is adversely affecting the mental health of the patients infected with the virus and the psychological impact on recovered COVID-19 patients is not clear. The study aimed to assess Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and depression among COVID-19 patients post recovery from the disease. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted from November 09, 2020, to December 23, 2020. The study enrolled recovered COVID-19 patients through telemedicine mode from the database of patients provided by the health authorities. National Stressful Events Survey PTSD Short Scale [NSESSS] for adults was used for assessing PTSD symptoms and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used for assessing depression. RESULTS: The study enrolled 503 recovered COVID-19 patients with a mean age of 41.90 years. The majority were asymptomatic (64.6%) while 21.5% developed moderate to severe form of the disease. The prevalence of PTSD symptoms and depression was found to be 56.9% and 29.0% respectively. COVID-19 patients with severe form of disease were significantly more affected with PTSD symptoms [vs mild, Odds Ratio (OR)= 18.7, Confidence Interval (CI)= 9.9-35.5] and depression (vs mild, OR= 19.8, CI= 9.9-39.5). Similarly, the patients who required oxygen or ventilator support reported a significantly higher PTSD symptoms (vs managed at home, OR= 17.4, CI= 8.3-36.4) and depression (vs managed at home, OR= 22.0, CI= 10.1-47.7). CONCLUSION: The study reported that recovered COVID-19 patients suffered from a significant amount of depression and experienced significant PTSD symptoms. It will help in addressing a major psychological concern among the recovered subjects.

Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among healthcare workers during the Omicron era.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant psychological stress among healthcare workers. This study aimed to clarify the factors that influenced health workers' posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Method: A total of 443 healthcare workers from eight Mental Health Centers in Shandong were recruited to attend an online survey. Participants completed self-evaluation measures of exposure to the COVID-19 environment and PTSD symptoms, as well as measures of potential protective factors such as euthymia and perceived social support. Results: About 45.37% of healthcare workers had severe symptoms of PTSD symptoms. Healthcare workers with more serious PTSD symptoms were significantly related to higher exposure to COVID-19 (r = 0.177, p < 0.001), as well as lower levels of euthymia (r = -0.287, p < 0.001) and perceived social support (r = -0.236, p < 0.001). The structural equation model (SEM) further revealed that the impact of exposure to COVID-19 on PTSD symptoms was partially mediated by euthymia, and moderated by perceived social support, especially from others (e.g., friends, leaders, relatives and colleagues). Conclusion: These findings suggested that improving the state of euthymia, getting social support from others could alleviate PTSD symptoms among healthcare workers during the COVID-19.

Factors Associated with Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress in Mothers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate the factors associated with symptoms of posttraumatic stress in mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted with mothers of children and adolescents living in Brazil, who answered an online questionnaire containing sociodemographic variables and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised. The Poisson regression model with robust variance was used to identify the factors associated with posttraumatic stress. RESULTS: A percentage of 83.82% of mothers reported an overload in caring for their children during the pandemic. The prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms was 39.05%, and this condition was associated with younger age, living in the northern region of the country, using medications, presenting neuropsychiatric comorbidities and being little/more or less satisfied with life. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The mental health situation of mothers during and after the pandemic must be monitored, in order to guarantee public policies capable of optimizing the coping with the situation.

Psychiatric Treatment Conducted via Telemedicine Versus In-Person Modality in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Mood Disorders, and Anxiety Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has played a vital role in providing psychiatric treatment to patients during the rapid transition of services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the use of telemedicine is expected to expand within the psychiatric field. The efficacy of telemedicine is well described in scientific literature. However, there is a need for a comprehensive quantitative review that analyzes and considers the different clinical outcomes and psychiatric diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: This paper aimed to assess whether individual psychiatric outpatient treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders in adults using telemedicine is equivalent to in-person treatment. METHODS: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials was conducted using recognized databases for this review. Overall, 4 outcomes were assessed: treatment efficacy, levels of patient satisfaction, working alliance, and attrition rate. The inverse-variance method was used to summarize the effect size for each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 7414 records were identified, and 20 trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The trials included posttraumatic stress disorder (9 trials), depressive disorder (6 trials), a mix of different disorders (4 trials), and general anxiety disorder (1 trial). Overall, the analyses yielded evidence that telemedicine is comparable with in-person treatment regarding treatment efficacy (standardized mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.09; P=.84; I2=19%, 17 trials, n=1814), patient satisfaction mean difference (-0.66, 95% CI -1.60 to 0.28; P=.17; I2=44%, 6 trials, n=591), and attrition rates (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.94-1.21; P=.32; I2=0%, 20 trials, n=2804). The results also indicated that the working alliance between telemedicine and in-person modalities was comparable, but the heterogeneity was substantial to considerable (mean difference 0.95, 95% CI -0.47 to 2.38; P=.19; I2=75%, 6 trials, n=539). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provided new knowledge on individual telemedicine interventions that were considered equivalent to in-person treatment regarding efficacy, patient satisfaction, working alliance, and attrition rates across diagnoses. The certainty of the evidence regarding efficacy was rated as moderate. Furthermore, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen the evidence base for treatment provided via telemedicine in psychiatry, particularly for personality disorders and a range of anxiety disorders where there is a lack of studies. Individual patient data meta-analysis is suggested for future studies to personalize telemedicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021256357; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=256357.